Palin’s Kid: A Doe in the High Beams

Two New York reporters referred to Bristol Palin as doe-eyed  — a somewhat odd choice of words given her mother’s heralded talent for gutting doe-eyed creatures.  Or perhaps the metaphor is weirdly accurate.  Sarah Palin’s ideologies and aspirations have caught her teenage daughter in the public spot lights and gun sights —where she is destined to become a trophy to Palin’s failed abstinence-only education policies. 

 

I can sympathize.  Let me tell you.  Sarah Palin self-describes as a “nondenominational” Christian.  That’s home turf for me.

 

As a nondenomonational teen, the only information I got about reproduction was a book about hamsters, Susie’s Babies.  There were eggs and sperm involved, but to this day I couldn’t tell you how hampster sex works.  I can tell you that Susie didn’t make any decisions whatsoever—about whether she wanted that little hamster “pellie” (as we called it) in her little hamster place, or whether she wanted babies sucking on her little hamster nippies afterwards.  The before-conception part and the after-delivery part just weren’t that important. 

 

Sound familiar? 

 

Unlike Palin’s daughter, I wasn’t the offspring of a beauty queen, and I was a nerd, so the abstinence/ignorance approach worked for a while.  I finally got around to having sex during my junior year away from Wheaton College (of Billy Graham fame) – because my virginity had become something of an embarrassment.  Even then, my ignorance was as intact as my hymen.  I was utterly surprised to see the mess we created.  (What did that poor boy tell his parents about their upholstery?)  Two years later, when I finally settled into a rather normal sexual relationship, I was secretly convinced that I myself was not normal.  Why?  Because when I had sex, wet stuff came out afterwards.  Nobody in books ever has that happen.  

 

What did Bristol know the first time?  I wonder. 

 

The trinity of fundamentalism in church, denial at home, and Falwellian education policies leave kids like Bristol to rely on willpower and prayer for contraception.     If either worked reliably, the human race would be extinct.  Instead, the call of the wild is so powerful that people have sex in places and at times where they could be killed for it–and are!–because the virginity code also appears to have its roots in biology.

 

Biologists explain our obsession with virginity as the need of males to invest their efforts in rearing their own genetic offspring.  But in day to day life, the elevation of virginity is far from rational.  Female virginity has magical curative powers in some places, magical erotic powers in others.  Among Christian fundamentalists, it is sacred.  Kids deal with the battle between their biological and religious imperatives by pretending that nothing’s happening.  A major problem with pills and condoms, besides inconvenience and cost is that contraception messes up the pretense.  If you go on the pill or buy condoms, then what might have been a forgivable sin of passion becomes premeditated sex.  Ooh. 

  

Palin has said that she is proud of her daughter’s choice to continue her pregnancy.  But  really, what choice did Bristol have at that point?  Ruin her mother’s career by having an abortion?  Violate one of her family’s defining values?  Do the thing that her God hates the most? 

 

Besides, where would she even go?  Imagine living in a town small enough that a girl’s pregnancy is an "open secret.”   What is the likelihood that a governor’s daughter can walk into a clinic unnoticed? How about just walking into a drug store and buying a pack of condoms without bumping into someone from church or school? The alternative to pregnancy: premeditated sin plus public exposure.  Bristol, like many teens under similar circumstances, chose to gamble.

 

I’m thankful that, for the time being, my own daughters have a broader array of options. 

 

Seattle

September 8, 2008

 

Advertisements

About Valerie Tarico

Seattle psychologist and writer. Author - Trusting Doubt and Deas and Other Imaginings. Founder - www.WisdomCommons.org.
This entry was posted in Christianity in the Public Square. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Palin’s Kid: A Doe in the High Beams

  1. Unknown says:

    thank you.
    HTML clipboard tags كاس الخليج

     الدوري العربي
     اهداف ومباريات

    الدوري السعودي23 منتديات كورة
    kora

    Like

  2. Unknown says:

    Good points all…the life in that town for someone that prominent is something most of us have not considered. One point: Virginity is often preferred by males as they may not want to be compared to other males. This thought is often upsetting to lesser endowed men and they will search for wife-material in the less experienced ranks for fear of embarassment in more experienced company. Much racial anger stems from white women with black men for this reason.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s