Goats? Zombies? A 13-year-old slave? Your uncle’s wife? Test your knowledge of 20 Iron Age do’s and don’ts.
Some folks believe that America should be subject to biblical law rather than constitutional law, that public servants— like Kentucky clerk Kim Davis—owe their highest allegiance to the Bible, which means they shouldn’t be forced to give out unbiblical marriage licenses—like to gay couples.
The issue, obviously, is contested by a host of liberals, secularists, Satanists and moderate Christians. But assuming that Bible believers and religious freedom advocates carry the day, public servants will need to know their Good Book. I have written elsewhere about biblical justice (If the Bible were Law Would You Qualify for the Death Penalty? and Bible vs Quran—Test Your Knowledge of Who Deserves Death in Which Religion), and readers found those lists illuminating. So, I thought folks might appreciate the following 20 item quiz, which can be used to screen applicants for county clerk positions or as a guide for those already working the job.
If Kentucky issues only biblical marriage licenses, to which of the following couples should a county clerk grant a license?
- A man with a consenting woman, but without her father’s permission.
No. Numbers 30:1-16 teaches that a single woman’s father has final authority over legal contracts she may enter.
- A man, a nonconsenting woman, and her father.
Yes. According to the Law of Moses a female is male property, as are slaves, livestock, and children. (See Exodus 20:17, Exodus 21:7). Her father can give her in marriage or sell her to a slave master. Female consent in the Bible is not a prerequisite for marriage or sex.
- A married man and three other women.
Yes. The Old Testament endorses polygamy, and the New Testament does not reverse this—except for church elders (1 Timothy 3:2). (See Biblicalpolygamy.com)
- A childless widow and her husband’s reluctant brother.
Yes. Genesis 38:8-10 makes it clear that a man has a responsibility to seed children for his deceased brother. In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus doesn’t alter the tradition but does say it will no longer apply in heaven. (Matthew 22:24-28)
- Two men.
No. Leviticus is clear. Two men having sex is an abomination, just like eating shellfish, getting tattoos, shaving your beard, or wearing blend fabrics. (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13, 11:9-12, 19:28, 19:27)
- Two women.
No, not even with their fathers’ permission. Paul’s epistle to the Romans (1:26) says that this is degrading and unnatural.
- A man and a divorced woman.
No. Unless her husband divorced her because he found out that she wasn’t a virgin when they married, anyone who marries a divorced woman is committing adultery. A marriage license in this case would be an adultery license. (Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9)
- A woman and a divorced man.
No. A man who divorces his wife and remarries is committing adultery. (Luke 16:18)
- A Christian and a Hindu.
No. The Apostle Paul calls this being unequally yoked (2 Corinthians 6:14). If the applicants balk at your refusal, you might respond gently with Paul’s own words: “What fellowship has righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion has light with darkness?”
- A soldier and a virgin prisoner of war.
Yes, but you should provide written instructions on the purification ritual required before bedding her. The soldier must shave her head and trim her nails and give her a month to mourn her parents before the first sex act. Also, remind him that if she fails to ‘delight’, he must set her free rather than selling her. (Deuteronomy 21:10-14)
- A rapist and his victim.
Yes, with qualifiers. The woman’s consent is not an issue, but her father should be present as he is owed 50 shekels (approximately $580) for the damage to his daughter. Also, the contract should have an addendum stating clearly that no divorce will be allowed. The rapist must keep her for life since, obviously, no one else will want the damaged goods. (Deuteronomy 22:28-29)
- A man and his wife’s indentured/undocumented servant.
Yes, although you might remind the man that in this case a marriage license is not a prerequisite to sex, since community property laws apply. However, should God bless this union with babies, any offspring will belong to the man and his wife, not the indentured woman. (Genesis 30:1-22)
- A man and his mother, sister, half-sister, mother-in-law, grandchild, or uncle’s wife.
Probably not. Although God’s law is timeless and unchanging, He does seem to shift on this one. In the book of Genesis, God rewards marriages between siblings—for example, the Patriarch Abraham and his half-sister Sarah. But later texts specifically prohibit a variety of incestuous relationships. (e.g. Lev. 18:7-8; Lev. 18:10; Lev. 20:11; Deut. 22:30; Deut. 27:20; Deut. 27:23)
- A man and a 13-year-old girl.
Yes. Like the Quran, the Bible puts no lower limit on the marriageability of girls. A father can give or sell his daughter into marriage at whatever age he deems appropriate. Tradition suggests that Mary the mother of Jesus was impregnated in her early teens. One gospel that didn’t make it into the Catholic/Protestant Bible puts her betrothal to Joseph at age 12.
- A black woman and a white man, or vice versa.
Absolutely not. Scripture is full of verses prohibiting interracial marriage. (Gen. 28:6; Exod. 34:15-16; Num. 25:6-11; Deut. 7:1-3; Josh. 23:12-13; Judges 3:5-8; 1 Kings 11:1-2; Ezra 9:1-2, 12; Ezra 10:2-3, 10-11; Neh. 10:30; Neh. 13:25-27)
- A gentile and a Jew.
No. If the Jew should appeal to the Anti-Defamation League, remind them of how dangerous such a union could be: “Thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.” (Deuteronomy 7:3-4)
- A man and a pregnant woman who claims to be a virgin.
Yes. You may feel personal misgivings about a marriage that is based in deception from the get-go, but judge not that ye be not judged. One in 200 American women who give birth say they have never had sex. Rather plaguing this young couple with your corrosive doubt, you can encourage them with the biblical virgin birth story, while taking care to avoid any sex-negative implications that might harm their marriage.
- A man and a goat.
Don’t be ridiculous. Can a goat sign a marriage license?
- A man and a sex-trafficked teen he bought from a gangster.
Yes, but not until Kentucky legalizes sex trafficking. Sexual slavery is quite common in the Bible, well regulated (For example, Judges 21 ), and frequently sanctioned or blessed by God. However, the New Testament teaches that we should pay our taxes and be law abiding, even under a secular/pagan government. (Titus 3:1; 1 Peter 2:13-17)
- Two zombies.
Only if they are not Christians. Jesus states clearly that there will be no marriage for Christians in the afterlife (Matthew 22:24-28). Otherwise, marriage between the dead or undead is not addressed in the Bible, and you should default to whatever the Supreme Court may have ruled on this matter.
Note: Some liberal Christian license seekers may complain to you or your supervisor that these guidelines come mostly from the Old Testament, which has been replaced by a New Covenant under Jesus. Ask them if the Old Testament is still part of their Bible. Remind them that the Ten Commandments are in the Old Testament—all three versions. Lastly, quote the words of Jesus:
Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5: 17-19).
Stand firm. If the Bible is the perfect Word of the living God, your detractors are up against the Almighty himself. As the spiritual warfare hymn reminds us, the gates of hell shall not prevail against you and the hordes of (liberal, gay, atheist, feminist, zombie) darkness cannot quench your light.
Valerie Tarico is a psychologist and writer in Seattle, Washington. She is the author of Trusting Doubt: A Former Evangelical Looks at Old Beliefs in a New Light and Deas and Other Imaginings, and the founder of www.WisdomCommons.org. Her articles about religion, reproductive health, and the role of women in society have been featured at sites including AlterNet, Salon, the Huffington Post, Grist, and Jezebel. Subscribe at ValerieTarico.com.
Once again you’ve provided a great public service.
If only your thoughts were read and given serious consideration by the buffoons who need to hear and understand it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you. :)
That puts it in perspective, doesn’t it! Any good and true Christian should appreciate your efforts in reminded them what it means to be a servant of YHWH and what it means to toe the line of the biblical covenant.
Correction: oops, that would be “reminding” not “reminded”
Reblogged this on Life After 40 and commented:
I think Valerie Tarico is marvelous. Her many posts are truly thought provoking and well written. Her new post entitled “A Biblical Guide to Marriage Licenses” is definitely worth the read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for, again, showing the danger of following all biblical rules and the absurdity of trying to make these rules the law of the land now.
The only question I have is on #14 “A black woman and a white man, or vice versa. Absolutely not.”
What about Moses? Many biblical scholars think Moses’ wife was a black African.
That’s hard to answer because many other people suspect Moses never existed. All I can go by is the texts still in the Bible that prohibit racial intermarriage.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, as a literature teacher and a reader of textural criticism, I am familiar with minimalism’s claims–that famous characters of antiquity such as Abraham, Moses, Buddha, etc. never existed.
Possibly yes, possibly no. (A similar hypothesis has been made by a few scholars that Shakespeare didn’t write his plays; Marlowe or Bacon or another did. All very intriguing scholarly questions.)
But as you say, what we do have are the texts. Even if there was no Moses, (a possibility), and no African wife, etc., readers still need to deal with the passages, (even if they are totally fictional) because “someone” did write them about a character.
The texts seem to imply that the alleged Jewish leader married a Black woman and that his sister was opposed to the marriage so was turned to leprosy white.
(1Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite woman whom he had married, for he had married a Cushite woman. 2And they said, “Has the LORD indeed spoken only through Moses? Has he not spoken through us also?” And the LORD heard it. 3Now the man Moses was very meek, more than all people who were on the face of the earth. 4And suddenly the LORD said to Moses and to Aaron and Miriam, “Come out, you three, to the tent of meeting….Why then were you not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?” 9And the anger of the LORD was kindled against them, and he departed.
10When the cloud removed from over the tent, behold, Miriam was leprous,a like snow. And Aaron turned toward Miriam, and behold, she was leprous.”
Numbers 12:1-10 ESV
This has been a Jewish view at least as far back as the Jewish historian Flavious Josephus (37-100 AD).
It’s true that Jewish people were very xenophobic. Some scholars think that the short story books Ruth and Jonah were written in about 500 B.C. to counter this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s fascinating. Thank you for sharing this information.
That’s because Moses was black. Makes perfect sense. Most of Abraham’s descendants were from the Semetic areas (Arabian/North African lands). Really they are a mix of white, black, brown, even with East Asian features. It just depends on how much they’ve bred with different tones to get their color. That’s pretty much why those 3 continents are connected.
Your article proves, yet again, that Christian ignorance of scripture is more than skin deep. It goes all the way to the bone.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s always nice to start the day with a good laugh. When I accessed your link to the Ten Commandments, I came across the following (in reference to their being 4.7 Bibles per household):
“Now, I should note that a young non-religious friend once came home from school with a bright green Gideon’s New Testament that she later touted as a reserve of fine rolling papers, which may explain why the household average isn’t a solid 5.”
It’s taken me several minutes to stop laughing long enough to thank you!
It’s always been a man’s world and today’s guys & gals are trying to keep it so!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great reference and commentary, Valerie! I’m holding on to it. I’m sure it will come in handy.
Why can’t religious people comprehend logic?
p.s. You are brilliant. You express my sentiments exactly, in the most articulate manner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. Thanks! I’m honored!
I like the part where you point out that the Bible calls on Christians to obey their secular government.
LikeLiked by 2 people