The Sex-Negative Message in the Virgin Birth—It’s Worth a Family Conversation

Christmas - AnnunciationThe birth story of baby Jesus celebrates the promise of new life, but for girls it also sends a harmful message. How can we acknowledge this without spoiling the rest?

Most Americans, even many who are not very religious, look forward to Christmas as a time to celebrate warmth, friendship, generosity and good cheer. Familiar festivities weave together stories and traditions from many cultures, which makes it easy to find something for everyone. But maybe it’s time to look a little closer at the Christmas story itself.

The birth story of the baby Jesus is heartwarming and iconic—the promise of new life and new hope in a time of darkness. It has inspired centuries of maternal art and is the best loved of all Bible stories. It also has a darker subtext, especially for someone like me—the mother of two daughters.

In the story, an angel appears to a virgin girl, announcing that she will conceive a baby boy. Her fiancé Joseph decides to stick with her only because her baby bump is of divine origins. The author of Luke makes a point of telling us that he refrains from sex with her till after the baby Jesus is born. All of this emphasis on Mary’s sexual history, or rather lack thereof, sends a message that can be shaming and harmful: Only an unbedded, unsullied, unused female—a virgin—could be good enough to birth a perfect child, the son of God.

Virginity Equals Purity

Girls who have sex are soiled. That may not be the first thing that comes to mind when we see a picture of Madonna and child or hear a Christmas carol, but the message is clear all the same, and the fact that it is subtext may make it all the more insidious for young women.

Mind you, Christianity is not the only religion that has assigned such extraordinary status to the pristine vagina or, conversely, treated female sexuality as something lesser or tainted. For example, Buddha’s mother Maya, called the “best of all women,” becomes pregnant after a god in a dream enters her womb from the side. Adding insult to injury, Buddhism tells us that a

“Bodisat leaves his mother’s womb erect and unsoiled, like a preacher descending from a pulpit or a man from a ladder, erect, stretching out his hands and feet, unsoiled by any impurities from contact with his mother’s womb, pure and fair, and shining like a gem placed on fine muslin of Benares.” — Mahapadana-sutra, Digha ii. 12

In the Ancient Near East, the birthplace of Christianity, some cultures saw the woman’s body as a vessel for a baby, which grew from the seed of a man or sometimes a supernatural being, much as a seed might grow in the earth. In this way of thinking, heroes and powerful men must have come from divine seed, and claims of a sexless conception underscored their supernatural origins. The Pharaoh Amenhotep III, Perseus, Romulus . . . even Augustus, Pythagoras, and Alexander the Great all were the subject of miraculous birth claims.

Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe

The enormous value that patriarchal cultures and religions place on female virginity has roots in biology. We’ve all heard the saying, “Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe.” From time immemorial men have sought to control female sexuality to ensure that the children in which they invest their time, money and life energy are their own; and also to maximize their own offspring. Male animals of some other species do the same. For example, when a new male lion comes into a pride, he may kill all of the cubs from the previous male, which brings the females into heat so that he himself can mate them.

Man’s Instincts Become God’s Edicts

In the tribal, herding cultures of the Near East a young woman’s sexuality—her ability to produce purebred offspring of known origin—was an asset that belonged to her father. In the Hebrew Bible’s legal code, a rapist can be forced to purchase the goods he has damaged and to then keep her as a wife. A girl who voluntarily destroys this family asset by having sex before her wedding is to be stoned—the same penalty that persists in Islam today.

A woman’s reproductive capacity is also valuable booty of war. In the battle between the Israelites and Midianites, for example, God’s messenger instructs that the Israelites are to kill all of the women who have been with a man but to keep the virgin girls for themselves. (These and other horrible references here.)

Culture and religion transform biological urges into legally binding prescriptions from God himself. Once that happens, patterns that may have started for practical or biological reasons take on a momentum of their own, and we see this in the history of the Virgin Mary.

The Sexless Union of Israel and Rome

The earliest sects of Christianity disagreed with each other about when and how Jesus became uniquely divine. Some believed that he was adopted by God at the time of his baptism or resurrection. But as Christianity, with its Hebrew roots, adapted to the cultures of the Roman Empire, the story of a supernatural, sexless birth won out. It beautifully merged the god-man tradition of the Empire with Judaism’s obsessive and multifaceted focus on purity—pure bloodlines, pure foods, unblemished bodies, monotheism, unblended fabrics, and, of course, virginity.

The Roman Catholic Church took the last of these new heights, turning Mary into a perpetual virgin for life and then for all of eternity, and eventually making vows of sexual abstinence a requirement of monastic life and the priesthood.

Actress Julia Sweeney, in her funny, tender monologue, Letting Go of God, describes an encounter with two fresh-faced Mormon missionaries. Finding herself incredulous at some their beliefs, she pictures door-to-door Catholics enthusiastically endorsing the faith of her childhood:

If someone came to my door and I was hearing Catholic theology and dogma for the first time, and they said, “We believe that God impregnated a very young girl without the use of intercourse, and the fact that she was a virgin is maniacally important to us . . .” I would have thought that was equally ridiculous. I’m just so used to that story.

Aphrodesia or Death

“Maniacally important” may be a quirky Julia Sweeney turn of phrase, but it contains an oversized grain of truth. The Catholic pantheon of saints and martyrs is peopled with females who, with Mary as their model of virtuous womanhood, valued their virginity (and their chaste yet semi-sexual devotion to Jesus) more than their lives: St. Agatha, in an attempt to break her virtuous resolve, was handed over to Aphrodesia, “an abominable woman, who, together with her daughters, publicly professed immodesty.” St. Lucy, “was yet very young when she offered to God the flower of her virginity.” St. Barbara’s “father, carrying out her death sentence, beheaded her himself, and in turn, legend says, was consumed by a fire from heaven;” and St. Ursula, was martyred on a prenuptial pilgrimage with 11,000 other virgins!

The glories of female virginity have spawned tributes ranging from paintings to pilgrimages and poetry to place names. Christopher Columbus christened the Virgin Islands in honor of St. Ursula and her untouched entourage, while the State of Virginia was named after England’s Elizabeth, “The Virgin Queen.” Virginia remains a popular girl’s name in the U.S., along with a host of variants such as Ginny, Ginger, Gina, Lagina, and Gigi. All of these mean chaste, fresh and maidenly—virginal.

Promise Rings and Purity Balls

Protestant Christianity is a rebel offspring of the Vatican, and even though the Protestant reformers rejected the cult of Mary, Catholicism’s supreme value on female chastity was deeply imbedded in their DNA, where it persists to this day. Among the more quixotic manifestations are purity balls and promise rings through which a young girl can pledge her maidenhead to her father for safekeeping until such time as he should hand it over to a mutually agreeable young man.

The image of a girl in a white dress dancing with her daddy, like a beautiful painting of Madonna and child, may evoke a feeling of sweet nostalgia. But rituals and icons like these are artistic residual of the ancient Near Eastern culture in which women (along with children and slaves and livestock) were literally possessions of men. As writer Jessica Valenti outlines in her book, The Purity Myth, they are the bright surface of a dark, deep cultural current that denies and shames women’s sexuality.

A woman used is a woman soiled. A woman raped is a woman ruined. A girl who explores her body with a boy is a licked lollypop. A divorced woman shouldn’t get married in white. Only an unbedded and so unsullied female—a virgin—could be pure enough to birth a perfect child, the son of God.

Beyond Virginity

How can sex-positive people who also enjoy Christmas affirm what it means to be fully female, including the physical pleasures of the female body, not merely its reproductive potential? How can all of us teach our daughters that their bodies are wholesome and beautiful, whether or not they have been molested or assaulted or have had sexual experiences of their own choosing? How can we help to break down the harmful virgin-whore dichotomy, with the only alternative being asexual motherhood?

Some Christian theologians have returned to emphasizing the earliest Christ birth narratives, in which Jesus came into the world in the normal way. Two Church fathers, Origin and Justin Martyr, mention sects of Christians who believed Jesus was the natural son of Mary and Joseph. The Apostle Paul and even the writer of Luke appear to have held this perspective, and the virgin birth is now thought to be a late addition to the gospel narratives.

Episcopal priest, Chloe Breyer summarizes the long history of Christian debate over the virgin birth in her article, “The Earthly Father.” Even after virgin birth stories emerged, a countervailing illegitimacy tradition persisted for centuries. By the time the Bible congealed in the fourth century, such perspectives were considered heretical, but they have been revived in recent years. Such arguments admittedly go against the current, but they show that belief in a virgin birth—with all that implies about female sexuality—is not necessary to Christianity or to appreciating many kinds of symbolism in Christmas story.

Progressive Christians, do not treat the Bible as the literally perfect word of God but instead understand it as a human-made set of documents containing moral and spiritual insights (and failings) of our ancestors. Secularists, though they may not prize the Bible, understand all sacred texts in this way, which allows us to glean through, keeping the parts that fit and treating the rest as a window into human history and psychology.

For those who share this mindset, whether or not they retain some belief in the supernatural, the Christmas story and season offer valuable opportunities to open up conversation with young people about many aspects of humanity’s long moral arc, including perspectives on the female body. Simply leaving youth to internalize negative messages about sexuality or waiting for them to bring up awkward topics is asking them to do our job. The wise parent or aunt or friend tunes in to readiness and explores ideas and values as opportunities arise. Perhaps one of your gifts during this holiday season could be the gift of a conversation.

________________________

Valerie Tarico is a psychologist and writer in Seattle, Washington. She is the author of Trusting Doubt: A Former Evangelical Looks at Old Beliefs in a New Light and Deas and Other Imaginings, and the founder of www.WisdomCommons.org.  Her articles about religion, reproductive health, and the role of women in society have been featured at sites including AlterNet, Salon, the Huffington Post, Grist, and Jezebel.  Subscribe at ValerieTarico.com.

Related:
Ancient Mythic Origins of the Christmas Story
The Not-So-Virgin Birth of the Christmas Story
12 Christmas Traditions That Aren’t About God or Shopping
Is it Ok to Celebrate Christmas Even If You’re Not a Christian?
Celebrating Love and Light:  Ten Holiday Tips for the Post Religious
Merry Atheist Christmas! London’s Atheist Church, the Sunday Assembly, Goes All Out to Celebrate Its First Holiday Season
In Seattle, Solstice is the Reason for the Season

About Valerie Tarico

Seattle psychologist and writer. Author - Trusting Doubt; Deas and Other Imaginings.
This entry was posted in Musings & Rants: Christianity and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The Sex-Negative Message in the Virgin Birth—It’s Worth a Family Conversation

  1. gwpj says:

    Reblogged this on Musings by George Polley and commented:

    Thoughts for the Christmas season and beyond.

    Like

  2. shatara46 says:

    Powerful observations that demonstrate how deeply rooted misogyny is in the Earthian mindset. What would shake me up were I young enough to worry about the state of things on earth is the unavoidable fact that organized religion in all of its darkest aspects is struggling (and succeeding) in making a global comeback. Information I received many years ago explained the simplistic Matrix control mechanism employed on this world. There is a trinity of powers taking turns in controlling earth. 1: religion, giving way to 2: the state, giving way to 3: money (Mammon, finance, the economy). In my lifetime I’ve seen the State give way to Money; seen the speed with which worship of money corrupts those who live for it and now I’m seeing that “old time religion” rear its death-head once again. I see it succeeding as people driven to seek relief from a killing marketplace and having no working concept of self-empowerment, begin to think that religion, however sick, may yet be the saviour in these darkening times. It’s the wheel turning, the “lesser of evils” as a steel hand dressed in a kid glove. And as it turns, it crushes the poor, the marginalized, those cornered by consumerism and believers in turn. As history amply demonstrates, all great “changes” (turning of the wheel) are greased by flowing blood. And a lot of that blood belonged to women and children, always the innocent victims of pseudo-change set in motion by social madness. Nothing has changed, nothing at all. The religious dragon went into a half-sleep, biding its time, regaining strength and preparing for its return upon the throne of power. Too fanciful? We’ll see.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. archaeopteryx1 says:

    For those who value virginity, both for its own sake and as a necessary condition of Saviors’ baby-mamas, there is a point that few ever consider – the child of a virgin mother must, of necessity, be the one to break his mother’s hymen. How Oedipal is that?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Patricia McCoy says:

      Liturgically minded Christians Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox comes to mind, believe that the birth of Jesus involved no damage nor even pain to Mary’s body. I don’t know what Protestants believe.

      I wish to add here, just as a thought that in Extraterrestrial belief circles there are the ideas that Mary had Tantric spirit not bodily sex to conceive OR more radically that artificial insemination was used. I think the latter might have been possible. But aren’t we focusing on the Annunciation and not the Nativity in such discussions?
      Also what muddies the waters is the Roman Catholic belief of the Immaculate Conception.

      People make constant mistakes with it; confusing that it is about Jesus ( it is not; it is about Mary’s own need while still inside of her Mother Anne to be purified of sin). This concept comes from following Augustine (Saint in the West, but called Blessed by the Eastern Orthodox who rejected his ideas on Original sin, thus they view the dogma of the Immaculate Conception as heretical and unnecessary) and their belief in his teachings about original sin.

      Confusion does cause problems.

      Like

  4. Reblogged this on kind-ism and commented:
    I had Sunday School teachers who insisted that Christian Science takes the “inspired” word of the Bible, and that the stories were “allegorical.” The virgin birth story (inspired allegory or not) always made me a bit uncomfortable. See also, https://valerietarico.com/2014/12/09/the-not-so-virgin-birth-of-the-christmas-story/ on how Jesus’ birth became more virginal and miraculous.

    Like

  5. Allan Avery says:

    (Elderly Allan A again, Catching Up) This may not be a hugely helpful Comment: but Wow! Valerie! How do you do it? How do you keep up with so much Information and “Package” it so beautifully every time? Should not all of Us Followers also be Crowdsourcing a New, ” 1 Percent” Funded, Entity for you merge into with a decent Salary and Broad Political Agenda? Whdaya’ Say, fellow Followers?? OK, I ALSO hope this isn’t so Off Message that anyone is offended. I just wish that I knew more related Blogs to Relay You onto. Likely that’s to be my Role.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Tim Martin says:

    I think you have Papa and Mama switched in your “Papa’s Baby, Mama’s Maybe” section heading.

    Like

  7. Pingback: Vridar » Some Christmas Holiday Reading

  8. John Forest says:

    As a husband, a father, a grandfather, and humanist- thank you. This message is long overdue

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Pingback: 12 worst ideas religion has unleashed on the world | Believers vs Non-Believers

  10. Skeeter Sanders says:

    As a former Roman Catholic, I’ve never accepted the myth of the virgin birth of Jesus, for the myth asks me to believe in something that was biologically impossible until the late 20th Century.

    The so-called “immaculate conception” of Jesus is an utter falsehood. Such a conception has been biologically possible ONLY since the 1970s, with the advent of in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination.

    I, therefore, do not believe for a New York minute that Jesus’ mother Mary could possibly have become pregnant without having engaged in sexual intercourse.

    Like

  11. Pingback: 12 de las peores ideas que las religiones le han dado a la humanidad – Neon_Knight's Blog

  12. bewilderbeast says:

    All patriarchal cruelty – from 3000 BCE to today 2021 CE. Patriarchal lies and cruelty.

    Like

Leave a comment